By Joel Andreas
Addicted to battle takes at the so much lively, strong, and harmful army on the earth. Hard-hitting, rigorously documented, and seriously illustrated, it unearths why the us has been inquisitive about extra wars lately than the other kingdom. learn Addicted to warfare to discover who advantages from those army adventures, who pays—and who dies.
"Political comics at its best."—Michael Parenti
Joel Andreas wrote and illustrated The remarkable Rocky, a satire that brought greater than 100,000 humans to the unsavory actions of the Rockefeller relatives. In among drawing illustrated exposes, he investigates the trajectory and destiny of the chinese language Revolution.
Read or Download Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't Kick Militarism PDF
Best war & peace books
Nations hardly ever disappear off the map. within the twentieth century, just a couple of international locations shared this destiny with Yugoslavia. The dissolution of Yugoslavia resulted in the biggest struggle in Europe on the grounds that 1945, giant human rights violations and over 100,000 sufferers. Debating the top of Yugoslavia is much less an try to re-write the dissolution of Yugoslavia, or to supply a special narrative, than to take inventory and contemplate the scholarship to this point.
Veterans of modern conflicts describe their person trips from uncooked recruit to warfare resister during this number of testimonials. even though it isn't really good publicized, the lengthy culture of refusing to struggle unjust wars keeps this present day in the American army. The tales during this publication offer an intimate, sincere examine the non-public transformation of every of those youngsters and while represent a robust argument opposed to militarization and unending conflict.
In 2009, Palestinians venerated the sixtieth anniversary of the Nakba - the main nerve-racking disaster that ever occurred them. The publication explores methods of remembering and commemorating the Nakba, facing the difficulty in the context of Palestinian oral historical past, "social heritage from below," narratives of reminiscence, and the formation of collective identification.
This paintings attracts on insights from the experimental and theoretical literature on bargaining to supply a much-needed entire remedy of the missed topic of the way wars finish. In a examine of the way states concurrently salary battle and negotiate peace settlements, Paul R. Pillar argues that warfare termination is better understood as a bargaining procedure.
- Lessons from Iraq: Avoiding the Next War
- LogoLounge 4: 2000 International Identities by Leading Designers (v. 4)
- Myth and Narrative in International Politics: Interpretive Approaches to the Study of IR
- Sovereignty and its Discontents: On the Primacy of Conflict and the Structure of the Political
- War and Conscience in the Nuclear Age
Additional info for Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't Kick Militarism
From their writings and from my own personal contacts with them, there is no question in my mind that the liberal Soviet intelligentsia rallying around Gorbachev has arrived at the end-of-history view in a remarkably short time, due in no small measure to the contacts they have had since the Brezhnev era with the larger European civilization around them. “New political thinking,” the general rubric for their views, describes a world dominated by economic concerns, in which there are no ideological grounds for major conflict between nations, and in which, consequently, the use of military force becomes less legitimate.
But the doctrine has little appeal for non-Muslims, and it is hard to believe that the movement will take on any universal significance. Other less organized religious impulses have been successfully satisfied within the sphere of personal life that is permitted in liberal societies. The other major “contradiction” potentially unresolvable by liberalism is the one posed by nationalism and other forms of racial and ethnic consciousness. It is certainly true that a very large degree of conflict since the Battle of Jena has had its roots in nationalism.
For the world at that point would be divided between a part that was historical and a part that was post-historical. Conflict between states still in history, and between those states and those at the end of history, would still be possible. There would still be a high and perhaps rising level of ethnic and nationalist violence, since those are impulses incompletely played out, even in parts of the post-historical world. Palestinians and Kurds, Sikhs and Tamils, Irish Catholics and Walloons, Armenians and Azeris, will continue to have their unresolved grievances.