Download Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge by Imre & MUSGRACE, Alan Ed LAKATOS PDF

By Imre & MUSGRACE, Alan Ed LAKATOS

Show description

Read or Download Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge PDF

Best history & philosophy books

Philosophy, Science and Divine Action

Probably the most vital and debatable topics within the modern discussion between scientists and Christian theologians is the problem of "divine motion" on the earth. This quantity brings jointly contributions from top students in this subject, which emerged out of the clinical views on Divine motion undertaking, co-sponsored through the Vatican Observatory and the guts for Theology and average technology.

Concepts of Force

Either historic therapy and important research, this paintings through a famous physicist takes a desirable examine a primary of physics, tracing its improvement from historical to fashionable instances. Kepler's initiation of clinical conceptualization, Newton's definition, post-Newtonian reinterpretation — contrasting ideas of Leibniz, Boscovich, Kant with these of Mach, Kirchhoff, Hertz.

The aspiring adept : Robert Boyle and his alchemical quest

The Aspiring Adept offers a provocative new view of Robert Boyle (1627-1691), one of many major figures of the medical Revolution, by means of revealing for the 1st time his avid and lifetime pursuit of alchemy. Boyle has frequently been thought of, besides Newton, a founding father of smooth technology due to his mechanical philosophy and his experimentation with the air-pump and different early medical equipment.

Extra resources for Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge

Sample text

All page-numbers given in the text refer to K uhn’s [1962]. S9 6o MARGARET MASTERMAN philosophers of science, they find any thinking that is based on it opaque. Kuhn’s form of thinking, however, is not in fact opaque, but complex, since, philosophically speaking, it reflects the complexity of its material. In an analogous way Lakatos, in Proofs and Refutations^ has introduced a new complexity and realism into our conception of mathematics, because he has taken a close look at what mathematicians really do when they refine and change each other’s devices and ideas.

You may say, perhaps, that in so describing Kuhn’s ‘normal’ science, I am implicitly and surreptitiously criticizing him. I shall therefore state again that what Kuhn has described does exist, and that it must be taken into account by historians of science. That it is a phenomenon which I dislike (because I regard it as a danger to science) while he apparently does not dislike it (because he regards it as ‘normal’) is another question; admittedly, a very important one. r In my view the ‘normal’ scientist, as Kuhn describes him, is a person one ought to be sorry for.

The success of the ‘normal’ scientist consists, entirely, in showing that the ruling theory can be properly and satis­ factorily applied in order to reach a solution of the puzzle in question. Kuhn’s description of the ‘normal’ scientist vividly reminds me of a conversation I had with my late friend, Philip Frank, in 1933 or there­ abouts. Frank at that time bitterly complained about the uncritical approach to science of the majority of his Engineering students. They merely wanted to ‘know the facts’.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.40 of 5 – based on 9 votes